urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Homelessness

 
Viewing 1-5 of 100. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

System Change Accomplishments of the Corporation for Supportive Housing's Returning Home Initiative (Research Report)
Jocelyn Fontaine, Caterina Gouvis Roman, Martha R. Burt

In 2006, the Corporation for Supportive Housing launched its Returning Home Initiative (RHI) with two goals: 1) to establish permanent supportive housing as an essential reentry component for formerly incarcerated persons with histories of homelessness, mental illness, and chronic health conditions; and 2) to promote local and national policy changes to integrate the corrections, housing, mental health, and human service systems. The Urban Institute assessed the process of system change stimulated by the RHI activities in three communities that received significant RHI investment and other jurisdictions. In addition, the report identifies challenges and lessons learned from the RHI to date.

Posted to Web: July 19, 2010Publication Date: June 01, 2010

Residential Instability and the McKinney-Vento Homeless Children and Education Program: What We Know, Plus Gaps in Research (Policy Briefs/Metropolitan Housing and Communities)
Mary K. Cunningham, Robin Harwood, Sam Hall

This brief describes the McKinney-Vento Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program (ECHY), summarizes the research, and outlines future research questions of concern to policymakers.

Posted to Web: June 22, 2010Publication Date: May 01, 2010

Strategies for Improving Homeless People's Access to Mainstream Benefits and Services (Research Report)
Martha R. Burt, Jenneth Carpenter, Sam Hall

Homeless people in HUD-funded shelters and transitional and permanent supportive housing programs often need benefits and services from welfare, health, mental health, and other mainstream systems to help them stabilize their lives. Many find it hard to access these systems, however. As HUD homeless-related resources have shifted from 60 to 33 percent going to services in the past five years, this study's central question was how communities have compensated. We found that communities evolved smoothing, expanding, and changing mechanisms to reduce access barriers and that highly organized communities were most successful. But federal program regulations limit what local communities can accomplish.

Posted to Web: May 17, 2010Publication Date: March 10, 2010

Life After Transitional Housing for Homeless Families (Research Report)
Martha R. Burt

This report addresses two questions: 1) What happens to homeless families who "graduate" from HUD-funded transitional housing (TH)? and 2) What factors affect housing, employment, and children's well-being after TH? Project sites included Cleveland/Cuyahoga County, Detroit, Houston/Harris County, San Diego City and County, and Seattle/King County. 195 families were interviewed as they left TH, with 179 (92 percent) completing 12 month follow-up interviews. Certain aspects of TH programs and the way that mothers used them affected mothers' education and employment immediately after TH and employment 12 months later. Having a housing voucher at TH exit was the strongest predictor of stable housing during the year following TH, but had no effect on employment outcomes.

Posted to Web: May 03, 2010Publication Date: March 01, 2010

The Corporation for Supportive Housing's Returning Home Initiative: System Change Accomplishments after Three Years (Policy Briefs)
Martha R. Burt, Jocelyn Fontaine, Caterina Gouvis Roman

In 2006, the Corporation for Supportive Housing launched its Returning Home Initiative (RHI) with two goals: 1) to establish permanent supportive housing as an essential reentry component for formerly incarcerated persons with histories of homelessness, mental illness, and chronic health conditions; and 2) to promote local and national policy changes to integrate the corrections, housing, mental health, and human service systems. The Urban Institute assessed the process of system change stimulated by RHI activities in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago—three communities receiving significant RHI investment. This brief summarizes the influence of RHI-funded activities in each of these cities.

Posted to Web: February 08, 2010Publication Date: November 01, 2009

 Next Page >>
Email this Page