SHEILA R. ZEDLEWSKI, LINDA GIANNARELLI, LAURA WHEATON, JOYCE MORTON
This study implements the modern poverty measure for Minnesota using the American Community Survey (ACS) and simulates the potential effects of alternative safety net policies on poverty. The analysis uses the TRIM3 microsimulation model to correct for survey underreporting and to add information required for this poverty measure, including near-cash benefits, taxes and nondiscretionary expenses. The alternative simulations apply new program rules and behavioral assumptions to recalculate family resources and poverty. The results show the importance of the modern poverty measure for analyzing state policies and also highlight the numerous decisions and imputations required to implement the new measure.
Publication Date: March 01, 2010
LAURA WHEATON, JAMYANG TASHI
Many agree that the official measure of poverty in the United States is flawed. Experts have recommended an alternative measure of poverty that includes all family resources net of taxes and nondiscretionary expenses and updates the thresholds to reflect current spending patterns. This fact sheet describes the official poverty measure and an alternative measure developed by the National Academy of Sciences, and uses data from the 2006 American Community Survey to estimate the extent of poverty in Minnesota under the official and alternative measure.
Publication Date: February 15, 2010
MARGARET SIMMS, KARINA FORTUNY, EVERETT HENDERSON
Low-income status in the United States varies significantly by race and ethnicity. Of the more than 13.4 million families with children living on incomes less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level, 30 percent are Hispanic, 22 percent are black or African American, and 6 percent are other nonwhites. This fact sheet provides statistics on racial and ethnic differences in family structure, work effort, nativity or immigration status, earnings, and education.
Publication Date: August 07, 2009
LINDA GIANNARELLI, SHEILA R. ZEDLEWSKI
This report presents estimates of the potential effects of numerous proposals designed to reduce child poverty in the state of Connecticut (CT). The results show the effects of initiatives to increase adult education, expand and improve the safety net, and strengthen families through increased child support and post-welfare case management. The results show the effects using two measures of poverty (the official measure and a modernized measure that includes all family resources and updated poverty thresholds) as well as the sensitivity to assumptions about the effects of initiatives on employment and earnings.
Publication Date: August 6, 2009
RICHARD W. JOHNSON, GORDON MERMIN
Although poverty rates for Americans age 65 and older have plunged over the past half century, many people continue to fall into poverty as they approach 62, Social Security's early eligibility age. Among those who did not complete high school, hardship rates increase from 23 percent at age 52 to 54 to 31 percent at age 60 to 61, a relative increase of 36 percent. Hardship rates decline after age 62, when most people qualify for Social Security. These findings highlight the fragility of the income support system for Americans in their fifties and early sixties.
Publication Date: March 20, 2009
GREGORY ACS, LINDA J. BLUMBERG, HARRY HOLZER, PAMELA J. LOPREST, JENNIFER EHRLE MACOMBER, KARIN MARTINSON, SIGNE-MARY MCKERNAN, CYNTHIA PERRY, CAROLINE RATCLIFFE, MARGARET SIMMS, MARGERY AUSTIN TURNER, SHELLEY WATERS BOOTS
The Census Bureau released its annual report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage for the U.S. population on August 26, 2008. According to the report, median household income increased by 1.3 percent in 2007, while the overall poverty rate dipped slightly and the number and percentage of people without health insurance decreased. While the overall numbers were positive, not everyone shared in the economic gains. The number and percentage of children in poverty increased, and households in the lowest 40 percent of the income distribution had no significant income gains.
Publication Date: August 27, 2008
LAURA WHEATON, JAMYANG TASHI
In 2004, 36.6 million people—or 12.6 percent of the U.S. population—were poor. The “poverty gap”—the amount of additional income required to remove all Americans from poverty—was $105.6 billion. Poverty rates were highest for African Americans, Hispanics, women, and persons under 25. Without government benefits, 61 million people would be poor. Social Security and other social insurance programs remove 21 million people from poverty. Means tested programs remove 3 million people from poverty. If food and housing assistance were counted as income for poverty purposes, an additional 7.6 million people would be counted as not poor.
Publication Date: April 23, 2008
BARBARA BUTRICA
According to the federal government, elderly poverty rates among blacks are nearly triple and among Hispanics are more than double those of whites. Data from the 2004 Health and Retirement Study on adults age 65 and older, living alone or with only a spouse, show how assets, which are excluded from the official poverty measure, change elderly poverty overall and between racial/ethnic groups. Adding imputed housing rent and annuitized asset values to resources reduced overall poverty by 1.8 percentage points, but increased racial disparities because blacks and Hispanics have relatively little housing equity or financial assets.
Publication Date: February 29, 2008
BARBARA BUTRICA, DAN MURPHY, SHEILA R. ZEDLEWSKI
This paper uses data from the 2004 Health and Retirement Study to demonstrate how the poverty rate of adults 65 and older changes using alternative resource and threshold measures. Results show that alternative poverty measures that account for health spending produce higher poverty rates than the official measure, even those that include the value of housing and financial assets. Poverty remains concentrated among singles (disproportionately women), blacks and Hispanics, and adults 85 and older regardless of how it is measured because these populations have relatively little housing equity or financial assets.
Publication Date: January 15, 2008
LINDA GIANNARELLI, LAURA WHEATON, JOYCE MORTON
This report presents an analysis of policies recommended by the Center for American Progress Task Force on Poverty. The analysis uses the TRIM3 microsimulation model. The policies include increasing the minimum wage, expanding the EITC and other tax credits, expanding the child care subsidy system, increasing participation in the Food Stamp Program, rescinding restrictions on legal aliens' eligibility for benefits, and increasing the number of housing vouchers. The analysis focuses on the policies' impacts on poverty, using a broad definition of income—after taxes and child care expenses and including the value of food and housing aid.
Publication Date: April 25, 2007
AUSTIN NICHOLS
Over the past 10 years, U.S. child poverty rates took two sharp turns: a major reduction from 1993 to 2000 followed by a slight hike from 2000 to 2004. Both shifts have been even more dramatic for black and Hispanic children. Such abrupt shifts offer an unusual opportunity to tease out what factors contribute to changes in child poverty. Exploring the driving forces behind trends in child poverty offers insights on policy, as well as on the well-being of children, since child poverty is associated with many negative outcomes in later life—low earnings, reduced educational attainment, teenage childbearing, and physical and mental health problems.
Publication Date: August 25, 2006.
SIGNE-MARY MCKERNAN, CAROLINE RATCLIFFE
This research was supported by a Census-funded grant from the JCPR Research Development Grants Program and is based on work funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation under contract # HHS-100-99-0003. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and should not be attributed to the JCPR, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Publication Date: December 01, 2002
SIGNE-MARY MCKERNAN, CAROLINE RATCLIFFE
Prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation contract # HHS-100-99-0003 under Project Officers Laura Chadwick and Susan Hauan. The views expressed are solely those of the authors and should not be attributed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. Direct correspondences to Signe-Mary McKernan at smckerna@ui.urban.org or Caroline Ratcliffe at cratclif@ui.urban.org.
Publication Date: September 01, 2002
ROBERT I. LERMAN
This report was prepared for the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation under HHS Grant Number 00ASPE359A. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. The author thanks Kelleen Kaye for useful comments and Stephanie Riegg and Carolina Krawiec for excellent research assistance and advice.
Publication Date: July 01, 2002
ROBERT I. LERMAN
This report was prepared for the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation under HHS Grant Number 00ASPE359A. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. The authors thank our project officer, Kelleen Kaye, and Avner Ahituv for useful comments and Carolina Krawiec for excellent research assistance and advice.
Publication Date: July 01, 2002
Latest Research
Browse by Topic:
