urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Public Service/Subsidized Employment Programs

 
Viewing 1-5 of 35. Most recent posts listed first.Next Page >>

Publicly Funded Jobs - Summary (Summary)
Clifford M. Johnson, Amy Rynell, Melissa Young

The need for direct public job creation efforts is greater today than at any time during the past seven decades. With a national unemployment rate that recently exceeded 10 percent, a new federal initiative that puts jobless individuals immediately to work must be a central element of any strategy for restoring economic growth and responding to pressing human needs in 2010 and beyond. Public service employment and transitional jobs programs offer tested and urgently needed models for combating the current recession and advancing longer-term workforce development goals.

Posted to Web: July 15, 2010Publication Date: July 15, 2010

Low-Skill Workers' Access to Quality Green Jobs (Series/Perspectives on Low-Income Working Families)
Karin Martinson, Alexandra Stanczyk, Lauren Eyster

"Green jobs" have garnered attention and support from many circles. This brief discusses strategies for improving access to green jobs for low-skill individuals, particularly jobs that can improve workers' economic standing and better support families. To understand where green jobs for low-skill individuals can be found, we review green industries and occupations and what they pay. Next we identify "good" green jobs that pay enough to support employees' families. Finally we discuss how training for green jobs can equip low-skill workers with needed skills, recommend how to improve these training efforts, and detail examples of innovative programs.

Posted to Web: May 21, 2010Publication Date: May 21, 2010

Improving Education and Employment for Disadvantaged Young Men: Proven and Promising Strategies (Research Report)
Carolyn J. Heinrich, Harry Holzer

Low high school graduation rates and sharply declining employment rates continue to plague disadvantaged youth, especially young men. We review the evidence base on programs and policies such as youth development for adolescents and young teens; programs seeking to improve educational attainment and employment for in-school youth; and programs that try to "reconnect" those who are out of school and frequently out of work, including public employment programs. We identify a number of programmatic strategies that are promising or even proven, based on rigorous evaluations, for disadvantaged youth with different circumstances.

Posted to Web: May 06, 2010Publication Date: May 06, 2010

Publicly Funded Jobs: An Essential Strategy for Reducing Poverty and Economic Distress Throughout the Business Cycle (Research Report)
Clifford M. Johnson, Amy Rynell, Melissa Young

The need for direct public job creation efforts is greater today than at any time during the past seven decades. With a national unemployment rate that recently exceeded 10 percent, a new federal initiative that puts jobless individuals immediately to work must be a central element of any strategy for restoring economic growth and responding to pressing human needs in 2010 and beyond. Public service employment and transitional jobs programs offer tested and urgently needed models for combating the current recession and advancing longer-term workforce development goals.

Posted to Web: April 14, 2010Publication Date: April 02, 2010

Alternative Welfare-to-Work Strategies for the Hard-to-Employ: Testing Transitional Jobs and Pre-Employment Services in Philadelphia (Research Report)
Jennifer Yahner, Nancy M. Pindus, Additional Authors

Two welfare-to-work programs for hard-to-employ Temporary Assistance for Needy Families recipients are evaluated: a transitional-jobs model operated by the Transitional Work Corporation (TWC) and Success Through Employment Preparation (STEP), which addresses barriers to employment. TWC participants had significantly higher employment rates and earnings than the control group members, but the difference faded after the first year of follow-up. Moreover, earnings gains and welfare reductions largely offset one another. STEP program participants were not shown to work more, earn more, or receive less welfare than the control group.

Posted to Web: April 12, 2010Publication Date: October 01, 2009

 Next Page >>
Email this Page